« January 2005 | Main | March 2005 »
An interesting article on the top brands globally, and by continental region. Some surprising results including Al Jazeera as the #5 global brand, and Target besting Walmart handily in U.S./Canada. Also included some interesting tidbits including Starbucks opening 3.5 store per day, and Google accounting for 57% of all internet seaches.
In an article in USA Today, Michael Medved reflects on the underlying message Hollywood is sending with its Oscar nominations. Basically, they are afraid of traditional religion.
He also raises an interesting point regarding the historical success of biblical films. He notes:
Between 1949 and 1959, six religious-themed pictures (Samson and Delilah, David and Bathsheba, Quo Vadis, The Robe, The Ten Commandments and Ben Hur) each became the nation's top box-office hit in the year of its release, while drawing significant Oscar attention. Ben Hur, in fact, set a record that lasted for nearly 40 years with its 11 Academy Awards.
Hat tip on this one to Barbara at Church of the Masses.
The 2005 Catholic Blog Awards are now accepting nominations.
You have until this Frday at 12:00 P.M. EST to submit your nominations here.
Needless to say, if you like what we are doing (or even if you don't), we would welcome your nomination.
The annual pontifical yearbook is out, and the news looks good. Catholics are on the rise, with the baptized faithful sitting at 1,086 million in 2003, up from 1,071 million in 2002 with nearly 50% living in the Americas.
Despite my quibblings with President Bush's policies and rhetoric, I am proud to call this fine man our president. Read the text of the State of the Union. Well done.
Additionally, Bill McGurn, a very fine Catholic writer who has worked for National Review and the Wall Street Journal, has replaced Mike Gerson as the President's head speechwriter. An excellent choice.
The mark of fine leadership is the ability to amass the right "whos" and plug them into the organizational scheme. That Harvard M.B.A. the President possesses has taken him far. He seems to continuously demonstrate sound judgment.
When all is said and done, I think President Bush will go down as one of the great presidents of the 20th and 21st centuries.
Bruce Fein, writing in the Washington Times, comments on the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals ruling that a lawsuit against McDonald's on the grounds that it was endangering its customers with Big Macs, fries and shakes is meritless, and has been thrown out unanimously by a three-judge panel.
Fein makes the point that this lawsuit would have been unthinkable in the first place if we lived in a less effete society where parents took responsibility for their kids eating habits.
Worth the read.
Our friends in the public television realm are doing their best to normalize homosexuality by introducing kids to same-sex "families" in public television kids cartoons.
According to the Pioneer Press, an upcoming episode of "Postcards from Buster" (Buster is Arthur the aardvark's best friend. For those of you unfarmilair with Arthur, he is the Barney of the 21st century) features:
...a farm family that milks cows, builds bonfires and makes maple syrup.Seems tame. Except the rural Vermont family is headed by same-sex parents.
It makes me long for the good old days when Mr. Rogers visited peanut butter factories and fed fish.
Lent is upon us -- a time of purification and penance. Because I'm not particularly interested in being just a nice pagan, I thought I would really spend this Lent meditating upon how I can love my enemies (actually, one in particular as I try not to cultivate too many -- which is difficult since I am always defending Justice Scalia). This is easier said than done. While it is not too difficult to love those that wish us ill or hate us for what we stand for, when your enemies infiltrate your personal life or family, that is when it gets tricky.
While I think praying for your enemies and willing their authentic good is a start, does our obligation to love our enemy end there? What are the positive obligations of this command? What if they continue to sin against you and spit in your face? Must we be civil? Must we try to be-friend them? Can we admonish them as sinners and instruct them as ignorant?
I think this would be a great thread in our comments box. Please offer your suggestions to the benefit of our readers (and writers).
So says the MSM in chorus after the release of the President's budget. Here is the headline from today's Star Tribune, which expanded upon the lede from yesterday's New York Times, which noted that the new budget raises health care copayments for veterans. Hmmm. You have a gazillion page budget, and that is the dominant feature worth profiling?
"President Bush sent Congress a $2.57 trillion budget plan today that seeks deep spending cuts across a wide swath of government from reducing subsidies paid to the nation's farmers, cutting health care payments for poor people and veterans and trimming spending on the environment and education."
Read the full story here.
My question is, will there be a fair appraisal of this bill anywhere in the media besides talk radio, the blogosphere and Fox News? Does anyone have time to read this and analyze it. Are we to think that the President is so cavalierly stupid as to promote cuts in the very things Democrats will demagogue to defeat the Bush agenda?
And remember, spending cuts for liberals often mean reductions in the proposed annual spending INCREASES. So instead of increasing education spending 20% (as may have been scheduled or proposed), we only inrease it 10%.
Oh, the humanity.
Those legal nerds among us will immediately know the reference and be inspired to read this article by James Taranto chronicling the constitutional "right" of privacy.
So, is there a zone of privacy that government cannot enter into and interfere with? Is it possessed by individuals, families, groups? Is it an unenumerated right? Or, is it just the First Amendment (free speech and freedom of religion) or the Fourth (unreasonable searches and seizures)? Should we enshrine this in law?
Some interesting things to consider? I'd love to hear your various perspectives.
OK, I need to get on my policy wonk soapbox. Privatizing the nation's railroads would be a magnificent development and in my estimation would lead to a boom in rail travel. AMTrak is a horrible waste of resources (losing 500 million dollars annually) and is in one accident after another. It is expensive and slow. We can do better.
Incidentally, Minnesota Congressman Jim Oberstar (D-MN) is one of the chief defenders of the rail line. Why, one asks? There is no line I am aware of in his district, or a rail connection from Minneapolis to Duluth (please correct me if I am wrong). Let's get on the horn with legislators and help end the rail behemoth known as AmTrak.
The Catholic Church in the U.S. is quite young, and is consequently still learning how to do things like administer the sacraments, marriage in particular. At least such is what one would conclude from the fact that roughly 66% of all annulments granted world wide are decreed by U.S. (arch)dioceses.
To help combat this (okay, they didn't put it quite that way, but we are reading between the Italian lines here) the Vatican has just released updated guidelines for the annulment process.
Of course we still suffer from the media framing of annulments as "Catholic divorce" (perhaps the U.S. Bishops should put some of those annual Communication Campaign dollars to work combating this) which only results in disenfranchised faithful when they get that "bad" news that their marriage was really legit.
The document is called "Dignitas Connubii,” though I haven't been able to find a copy online yet.
According to an article in today's Star Tribune, the process has begun to open the cause of Rochester, Minnesota physician Dr. Giancarlo Rastelli.
Rastelli, who was born and married in Italy, first came to the Mayo Clinic in 1960, and died in Rochester in 1970 at age 36.
Bishop Harrington of Winona, MN gave Bishop Silvio Bonicelli of Parma, Italy, (Rastelli's native diocese) permission to lead the effort to have Rastelli canonized. With the Italians on board, championing his cause, Rastelli chances are definitely improved.
You can read more about Rastelli on page 2 of the February issue of the Winona Diocese newspaper.
Hat tip to my sister Catherine, who works at Rastelli's old parish in Rochester, for bringing this to my attention.
The 2006 Senate race in Minnesota was shaping up to be a weenie-fest. Sen. Dayton was poised to face Rep. Mark Kennedy in what was sure to be an uninspiring campaign. However, Dayton has spent his personal fortune, and because he is such a lame senator with no appeal whatsoever, has no money to run again and doesn't want to bankrupt himself. Thus, he has decided not to run for reelection.
This changes the dynamic because now the Democrats can put up a more credible, qualified and articulate candidate. While Bill Luther and Mike Ciresi are getting hyped early on (and Kennedy has already defeated Luther twice), my pick is that the Democrats will go with savvy Hennepin County Attorney Amy Klobuchar. Klobuchar is extremely intelligent, high-profile because of her prosecution work and very articulate (did I mention well-connected to the $$$$ in the legal community?). She could wipe the floor with Mark Kennedy (who is a very fine man, but not a good politician).
So, here is my early call to have one of our outstanding, articulate Republican women officials such as Michelle Bachmann or Mary Kiffmeyer get into this race (and encourage Kennedy to keep fending off Patty Wetterling in the 6th district).
The Dayton v. Kennedy blog will keep updates on this race (and hopefully rename itself).
An article in today's Dallas Morning News notes the growing popularity of the rosary among non-Catholics.
The ELCA has created their own Lutheran rosary for lent (though it is unclear what prayers one would say) and a Lutheran married to a Catholic has launched an "ecumenical rosary" that uses many of the same mysteries and ironically replaces the Hail Mary with other scriptural ejaculations.
According to the article:
Terry Ziegler, co-owner of Catholic Art & Gifts in Farmers Branch, Texas, said Protestant customers will sometimes ask, "I'm not Catholic. Can you sell me a rosary?" His reply: "If you've got cash or a credit card, sure."
At mass yesterday evening, the priest offered what I thought was a striking insight in his homily. Far more Catholics attend Mass on Ash Wednesday, than on the other holy days of obligation throughout the year.
I think this is largely attributable to the sacramental character of the liturgy. There is no skirting the reality of sin and death as the palm ashes are smeared on your forehead and you are reminded that such is the destiny of your body this side of eternity.
There is something about walking around all day with ashes smeared on your forehead that creates a sense of Catholic belonging that we rarely experience in this day and age.
However, the strong attendance at Ash Wednesday liturgies does call into question the logic that the faithful just can't make it to mass during the week, the very logic that undergirds the practice of transferring holy days of obligation to Sundays.
Leave the Holy Days alone, add some sacramentals to sweeten the deal, and the faithful will be there with ashes on.
While some may accuse our president of being a Christian zealot, his administration is not afraid of setting reasonable limits on the practice of religion. Take for example the case of the Brazil-based O Centro Espirita Beneficiente Uniao do Vegetal. His administration has asked the Supreme Court to bar them from using the hallucinogenic hoasca tea as part of their religious services.
According to an AP article in today's Lexington Herald-Leader:
The church, which has about 140 members in the United States and 8,000 worldwide, said the herbal brew is a central sacrament in its religious practice, which is a blend of Christian beliefs and traditions rooted in the Amazon basin.
The Bush administration asked the Supreme Court on Thursday to block a New Mexico church from using hallucinogenic tea that the government contends is illegal and potentially dangerous.
Mel Gibson is at it again, this time with a gentler cut of his hit movie The Passion.
According to ABC News, the new version reworks the scourging scence, cutting out about 6 minutes of suffering. According to the article:
The new less violent version of the film goes easier on the brutal details of the last days of Christ."There are no new scenes, and the cuts are limited to the more violent aspects of the film, if that's the right term. The scourging scene in particular has been substantially adjusted," Mr Davey said.
A study slated for publication in the journal Human Genetics gives a scientific boost to the argument that there is no such thing as a gay gene.
Apparently, scientists could find no statistically significant indication that genes make you gay:
The analysis says of the study, “The authors describe in the article three non-X chromosomal ‘new regions of genetic interest’ (7q36, 8p12, and 10q26). In the authors’ view, a noteworthy aspect of the study as follows: ‘Our strongest finding was on 7q36 with a combined mlod score of 3.45 and equal distribution from maternal and paternal allele transmission. This score falls just short of Lander and Kruglyak's (1995) criteria for genomewide significance.’ They go on to say ‘two additional regions (8p12 and 10q26) approached the criteria for suggestive linkage’ -- again pointing out that neither was statistically significant.”Thus, even the author’s “strongest finding” was not statistically significant by widely accepted scientific criteria.
The national Episcopal Church is out $4 million in donations since they ordained a gay bishop according to an AP article in today's Kansas City Star.
This represents a 12% decline in donations from local congregations, as some realign themselves with more conservative dioceses in Africa.
Bottom line, it pays to keep the commandments, and encourage others to do so.
A friend of mine at Notre Dame Law School emailed yesterday asking for prayers. Notre Dame has mired itself in another controversy, hosting a "Queer Festival" on campus. Yikes.
As to how this slipped through administration is baffling, considering the strong leadership in the provost and president's office. However, as the firing of Ty Willingham unfolded, it was clear "senior management" wasn't informed. Which begs the question of who is running the show at Our Lady's university. It appears that the trustees and donors run the athletic department, and the Left runs the rest of the campus.
Read the story in the Notre Dame Observer.
And our hearts are restless until they rest in thee. So says St. Augustine in one of the most beautiful lyrics to the Creator. Is it possible that we are "wired" for faith? Made to seek God? Nicholas Kristof asks that question in Sunday's New York Times.
It may be, says Kristof, that faith is an irrepressible part of the human condition. Try as we may to scorn it and keep it down, deeming it useless in modern, commercial society. It keeps popping up. The Chinese even made the world's firmest atheist, Chairman Mao, into a God. Ironic.
However, it all makes sense. It is only fitting that our Creator would create us in a way that would allow us to find home. It is as though there is a homing beacon inside us, providing a faint signal beyond the material to the One Who Is. God seeks out man, but provides in man the ability to seek God. As Aquinas said, the true end of man, what he was made for (his telos), was eternal communion with God. It really is "built" into us. As a great professor of mine once said, "We hit the ground running." And so it is.
Of course, this wouldn't be news if people read their Aquinas.
Hollywood Guru Barb Nicolosi posts her Lenten movie picks here.
There is a very good new article up at the Weekly Standard discussing demographic, economic, and cultural trends in America's cities.
The author, Joel Kotkin, claims that the fastest growing cities are one's that allow people to pursue "happiness". In Kotkin speak, that means have the most opportunity for upward economic mobility. By contrast, there are the Euro American cities that have become small bohemian paradises. As a result, elites move into these places, driving home and property values, displacing the "aspirational" crowd to other parts of the country. However, the "aspirational" cities now believe they must have little "So-Ho" enclaves if they are to compete for the New Elite. It is a Catch-22.
The cultural and political effect of this trend is far-reaching. Here is an excerpt from the article as an example:
"In the wake of John Kerry's loss to George Bush, a widely circulated editorial entitled "It's the Cities, Stupid" in The Stranger, a Seattle alternative weekly, called on Democrats to adopt a politics that excludes countryside, suburban, and exurban constituencies. Democrats "are the party of urban America," the paper proclaimed, suggesting a political approach catering to city-dwellers at the expense of those living in "the soulless sprawling suburbs" and in rural America.
"The highly urbanized Kerry voters, we were told, represented "the real Americans" who reject "heartland 'values' like xenophobia, sexism, racism, and homophobia." The suburbanites and small-town denizens came from places where "people are fatter and dumber and slower." "Let them have the shitholes, the Oklahomas, Wyomings, and Alabamas," the Seattle paper raged. "We'll take Manhattan.""
This story is particularly weird and worth reading. It chronicles a worldwide experiment centered around a little black box that predicts the future, using its connection to little sensory "eggs" and churning out random number sequences
What I take away from this piece is that scientists have some how found a way to tap into the order of nature. It would seem that we should dismiss projects like this (and they sound rather Orwellian), but like evolution, they may tell us something extraordinary about God and the universe. It could be that nature and catastrophic disturbances within it (such as mass destruction or loss of life) have a profound (history-altering) effect on persons and nature, whether or not we know it. Perhps there is a profound inter-connectedness between persons and creation. It would make sense in light of an understanding of sin that permeates all of creation. "All creation cries out, 'How long O Lord?'" Just as our actions (good or bad) can have a profound effect on others as their effects diffuse, why couldn't large pheonomena be "sensed" in nature, both forward and backward in the "space-time continuum." OK, I don't know about much about science, but that seemed like a good term to use.
Of course, this is all very speculative and random, but thoroughly interesting, even though it sounds like Obi-Wan Kenobi talking to Luke Skywalker about the Force and mitochlorians.
Not to be missed for our jurisprudentially-minded readers is this interview with my friend Mike Scaperlanda, professor of law at the University of Oklahoma, on the future of Catholic legal thought.
The case of Catholic Terri Schiavo took a turn for the worse today when Judge Greer denied her parents' motion to set aside his 2000 order and appoint an attorney for her.
According to the article:
Greer implied that Terri Schiavo would have been entitled to an attorney in a guardianship establishment proceeding. But he declared that she had no such right in a tube removal proceeding where her “guardian or surrogate decision-maker is authorized to exercise her constitutional right to privacy for her.”
I got an interesting letter in the mail today from yet another social service outfit in town, Animal Ark. Apparently this $591,000 per/year organization is committed to providing luxry accomodations for the homeless, homeless pets that is.
According to their site:
Dogs are housed in spacious kennels, the largest of which measure 9-feet by 12-feet. Each dog is provided with its own, soft, raised bed with blankets, chew toys and treats. Large, outdoor play yards are provided for our pooches. Three times each day, dogs are taken out for potty breaks and play with other dogs. In the heat of summer, kiddy pools and water misting systems provide the dogs with cool comfort. Additionally, dogs are walked each day by a group of dedicated volunteers.
Rabbits are kept in a luxury bunny suite that includes all the amenities a house rabbit deserves.
They also served 90,000 "meals" this past year, and have touched the lives of hundreds of pets. Take for example the heroic story of Annie.
Annie is a 7-year old German Shepherd that had lived her whole life outside on a short chain before coming to Animal Ark. And the years of neglect and abuse had taken their toll on her. Though she had a gentle peaceful spirit, she was fearful of everyone and everything. But with a lot of pampering, daily massages and lots of treats, Annie learned to apprciate her new life. Annie not only found a new home, Animal Ark used her story to help the City of Saint Paul to pass restrictions that prevent the chronic chaining of dogs outside.
Don't be surprised if the rising costs of Pet Care necessitate a new Peticaid Program so that no rabbit is left behind.
The startribune.com has an interesting comparison of views on the role of government as it relates to providing basic services for immigrants.
Here are excerpts of the two perspectives:
PERSPECTIVE 1
I believe that through heavy taxation (30 to 50 percent for most Americans), big and intrusive government actually hinders Christians' ability to give, leaving few available resources to help the poor. Instead, their income supports ever-expanding government bureaucracy and services through which its recipients become increasingly dependent upon the government; many are enslaved to the very system initially designed to liberate them.
PERSPECTIVE 2
Because human needs require it, and other resources are not available to meet those needs, we believe that it is right and proper to raise income taxes justly and equitably ... . We know [Minnesotans] are willing to sacrifice for their poor brothers and sisters facing difficult financial hardships. The taxes we pay today, and those paid by our parents and grandparents before us, have allowed us ... to develop and sustain a high quality of life [and] allow us to meet our moral responsibility toward our fellow citizens, our brothers and sisters in the family of God."
Now let's play match the perspective with the author.
POSSIBLE AUTHORS
A) The chair of the state democratic party
B) The chair of the state republican party
C) The head of a middle class household in Minnesota
D) A retired evangelical pastor
E) The local Catholic archbishop
Match the perspective with the author.
While the troops of the culture of death advance around the globe, the faithful remmnant in Europe has resisted, for now.
WARSAW, Poland--The Polish parliament voted Tuesday not to consider a controversial bill allowing abortion up to 12 weeks into pregnancy.
The bill had been proposed by the ruling Democratic Left Alliance but was fiercely opposed by the Catholic Church, conservative groups and large sections of the public in this fiercely Catholic country.
The bill would have also made sex education a separate subject in junior high schools and allowed minors to seek abortions without parental consent.
Consideration of the bill was defeated by 199 votes to 183.
I just came accross this interesting map of the percentage of Catholics by county in the US:
(Click on the map for a larger version)
Lots of mission territory down their in the bible belt!
I had the opportunity to attend a lecture last night by Cathy Cleaver Ruse, the official pro-life spokesperson for the U.S. Catholic Bishops.
The spiritual director for the Schindler family was in attendance, and after the lecture, he asked Ruse what the U.S. Bishops were doing to stand up for Teri Schiavo. After some quips about being video taped, and a prolonged silence, Ruse revealed that she had been specifically instructed that the Schiavo case is considered a strictly local matter, and she is not to speak to it at all. Keep in mind this is the national pro-life spokesperson for the U.S. Bishops.
Never mind the fact that the Schiavo case is in the national spotlight, with news outlets all over the country running the story. Never mind the fact that there are commentaries in the Washington Times, articles in the New York Times, opinions in the Los Angeles Times. This is the story of our times, an incredible opportunity to publicly affirm the value of all human life, and educate the faithful on end of life issues, and the U.S. Bishops are remaining silient, not accidentally, but willfully.
One would hope that the abuse scandal had taught the bishops something, but it seems it is business as usual at the UCCB. Needless to say, such actions seriously undermine the credibility of the bishops on the life issues as a whole.
Word on the street is John Paul II has another apostolic letter up his sleeve, this one dealing with recent trends in the media and communications. Slated for release Feb. 21st, the title is "The Rapid Development." Watch your mailbox.
The general world consensus is that the Iraqi elections were a great success. But isn't it ironic that most people have no idea who won?
The results, along with some analysis can be found here. Interesting reading.
Tim Monahan's Catholic colony and college in the sunbelt got the green light today.
The Southwest Florida Planning Council approved plans today for Ave Maria University and its adjacent town.Preliminary site clearing is already underway on 5,000 acres of field land in Collier County just south of Immokalee and 25 miles northeast of Bonita Springs.
The Roman Catholic University will eventually have 6,000 students. The town, also called Ave Maria, will have 11,000 diverse dwellings when built out, expected in 10 to 20 years.
First phases of the university and town will open together in the summer of 2007.
The Seven Deadly Sins seem to be all the rage these days, and the academies do not want to be left behind. Interestingly enough, the journal Text and Performance Quarterly is dedicating an issue to the Seven Deadlies.
Michael LeVan and Daniel Makagon, guest editors of Text and Performance Quarterly, invite essays at the intersections of performance, culture, and the seven deadly sins. Of particular interest are manuscripts that engage a specific deadly sin (e.g., lust, gluttony, sloth, anger, greed, envy, or pride). Topics addressed in submitted manuscripts may range from examinations of sin as method and/or resource for performance, scholarship, cultural critique, or political resistance to explorations of sin in the cultural imagination, in performance practice, as a technique of power, as an economic or social virtue, or as a resource for writing, relationships, freedom, or critique. Manuscripts from a wide range of perspectives, including rhetorical, feminist, ethnographic, political, and aesthetic are welcome.
As if the Queer festival at Notre Dame reported here a few days ago wasn't bad enough, the latest news is that the infamous Vagina Monologues are being performed on campus.
Not only are they being performed, the author, Eva Ensler, appeared as a luncheon guest on campus yesterday to mark the beginning of the three day run of the performance.
The local ordinary, Bishop D'Arcy, has been working quietly since this past summer to try and persuade Notre Dame to cancel the event, and issued a statement condemning Notre Dame's actions a few days ago.
Regrettably, the case of Notre Dame is not unique. The scandal of the performance of Vagina Monologues on Catholic campuses across the country is chronicled at the Cardinal Newman Society web site.
Of course the scandal at Notre Dame is far worse, in light of the institution's national Catholic reputation. William McGurn did a great job making this point in a recent article in First Things. He wrote:
In the last weeks of the 2004 electoral campaign, a Notre Dame dean, Mark Roche, appeared on the New York Times op-ed page making the case that, the evil of abortion notwithstanding, Kerry’s candidacy reflected Catholic teaching better than Bush’s did. On the whole, it reminded me of Marion Barry’s defense of his mayoral record in Washington D.C.: “Outside of the killings, Washington has one of the lowest crime rates in the country.”As a newspaperman who has solicited and edited op-eds for the Wall Street Journal on three continents, I’m fairly confident that the name the Times wanted on its pro-Kerry op-ed page was not Mark Roche’s but Notre Dame’s. Which reminds us that Catholic enablers are institutions as often as individuals. Had Governor Cuomo delivered his 1984 speech at Yale or had Mark Roche been a dean at Indiana University, nobody would have paid attention.
Remember, O most gracious Virgin Mary...
A few days back (Feb. 14), we had a post on this strange phenomenon going on at Princeton and other places. Now, the Evangelical Outpost has taken up the discussion in a lively way. Check it out.
Alabama state representative Alvin Hayes (D-Montgomery) is offering $5000 to anyone who can prove that Bible restricts marriage to one man and one woman.
""Anybody could have any interpretation they want of the Bible," Holmes told the Montgomery Advertiser."
This has raised all sorts of hackles with people dumping annotated and marked up Bibles at Hayes' office "proving" that the Bible is clear about marriage.
However, this problem gets to the heart of biblical interpretation and epistemology more generally. First of all, what does Hayes mean by prove? Does he requires some sort of absolute certainty. Is it one of the many burdens of proof available to legislators when constructing laws. No matter who offers him "proof," Hayes will always be able to hide behind a false notion of scientific and empirical proof that really cannot be applied to the Bible.
Furthermore, no matter how convincing your "proof" might be, if Hayes finds one religious figure to contradict you, you will be out of luck. Which of course raises the question -- by what authority? In order to be able to prove something of this sort, you have to agree on some standard interpretive authority or common framework of interpretation through which all parties can agree to be bound by. Otherwise, since words can mean anything we want them to mean in today's post-modern linguistically-debased context, you will get a quote like this from Hayes:
"Holmes responded quickly, according to the station, saying, "OK, but what that says [is] ... if two people should get married and if they are of the same sex then he becomes his wife and he's the husband.""
Of course, we will soon hear reports from the MSM that no one could "prove" it to him. Heh. Another case for the Magisterium.